Stop normalising sugar!

So many people struggle with their weight, and diabetes has been on the rise for many years now with no signs of slowing down any time soon.

What do I think the main (but not only) culprit is for this?

Sugar.

The problem is, it’s become so normal to eat sugar all day long that we don’t even think about it.

If someone smoked some weed or cracked open a beer as soon as they woke up, people would think they have a problem.

But if you wake up and dose yourself with caffeine (a stimulant/drug) and stick a couple of sugars in it, no-one bats an eyelid. In fact, people think you’re strange if you don’t do this?! 

Maybe you’ll have a biscuit with it, then a bowl of cereal… 

You then continue to repeat this multiple times throughout the day. Multiple teas/coffees and usually “snacks” between meals.

At lunch time it’s normal to have a little treat and a can of soda, but again, if you had an alcoholic drink on your lunch break it’d be frowned upon.

This is killing us. And not even that slowly!

And when it comes to kids – take a look around. Obesity is becoming more and more common amongst youngsters too.

Why is it ok to give a kid a sweet when they’ve had a haircut?

Why would you offer OTHER PEOPLES’ kids sweets and soft drinks by default when they come around?! (seriously, stop doing this!)

Why do grandparents (and parents) give their kids sweets daily?

…something you KNOW is bad for them?! (Though maybe you don’t know quite how bad)

Yes, they like them, but that doesn’t mean give it to them!

You’re not being kind by giving kids sweets, no matter how much they want them. You’re actually doing them harm! 

I believe it should be limited to small treats every now and then, not a regular part of their diet (this includes ALL sweets and sugary drinks). 

And the same goes for adults (ouch!).

Stop avoiding [healthy] fats (you need them in your diet), and start avoiding sugar like the plague.

If you’re at all serious about your own health, or the health of your children, you should probably have a little review of how much sugar you’re all consuming and see what you can do to reduce that.

I’d also avoid just replacing it with artificial sweeteners (“Diet” anything). They have their own issues and you’re best off just beating the sugar addiction without them.

There are so many things that you can do to improve your health, but it’s probably best to start by plugging the holes and getting rid of the things that are doing the most harm.

Sugar is one of them.

It’ll require a bit of discipline, some planning ahead, and a learning curve to master this, but it’ll be worth it.

And as for the kids, just tell them no! You’re in charge. Whilst you can control (at least in part) what they eat, why would you feed them stuff that’s bad for them?

There’ll probably be some tantrums (especially if they’re used to eating this junk every day) but it’s your responsibility as a parent/adult not to damage their health.

I realise I may receive some blowback from this, but someone’s got to say it. Don’t shoot the messenger. 

And before you say it, yes, I have kids. They have a “sweetie day” on a Friday with the occasional treat at other times, and they drink water. It’s not cruel, it’s kind, because I know that all they’re really missing out on is a lifetime of sugar addiction.

If you’re interested in getting control of your diet and lifestyle and living a healthier life, check out www.MoveBetter.Club or get in touch.

Mark

Walking is NOT enough

A lot of people think they do enough, despite not being happy with the results they're getting.

They wear a watch that tells them "well done, you've completed 10,000 steps today" and are then baffled why the weight isn't shifting.

WALKING IS NOT ENOUGH!

Unfortunately, constant 'activity' throughout the day is our baseline.

If you've done NOTHING for years, then walking may be a good place to start, but that's still just to get you back to baseline.

If you want to progress your health and fitness, you have to train for that.

 

Fitness-wise (i.e. cardiovascular health), walking just doesn't push you hard enough.

Up hill might be hard work, but just walking around hitting your step goal each day doesn't stress your body enough to need to adapt and get fitter.

If you want to IMPROVE your fitness, you have to push yourself harder.

It's the same as building muscle, your body won't build muscle in response to lifting a cup of tea a few times a day - you have to lift something heavy that challenges and stresses the muscle so that it will, in response, grow stronger, ready for the next time it faces that stress.

If you don't use your muscles enough, your body will offload any excess because it's not needed.

If you never stress your cardiovascular system, you'll LOSE fitness.

Studies have shown most people have lost about 40% of their lung capacity by age 50, and about 60% by age 80.

Why? It's not because of their age (or it'd be everyone, not just "most" people), it's because they haven't used it.

When was the last time you used your lungs to their maximum capacity? (We're talking all-out sprint for 200m+, run for your life type effort).

As soon as you're able to walk for more than half hour with minimal effort, you need to start adding intensity, not more "steps".

You need to create the stress for your body to adapt to.

What's the other thing we lose rapidly as we "age"? 

Strength.

So if you want to remain able-bodied as you age, this is the other thing you HAVE to be training.

Again, stress your body so it keeps hold of the muscle and strength it has, and also builds new muscle tissue and gains strength, instead of losing it as you get older.

YOU DO NOT LOSE STRENGTH OR FITNESS BECAUSE OF YOUR AGE - YOU LOSE IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T USE IT!

So to get the results you want, you just have to find or make the time and get it done.

Make sure you're doing the right things.

Look at the things people tend to lose as they get older (strength, speed, fitness, mobility) and work those! It's that simple!

And if you're already lagging in any of those, then get to work asap!

MoveBetter.Club can help 

The 2nd most common question I get asked...

Once people know what I do for a living, the immediate question I always get asked is...

"How do I lose this" (*usually pointing to a belly or bingo wings)

The standard answer that everyone believes to be true is to “eat less and move more”, but unfortunately, it’s not that simple anymore.

When we lived a natural lifestyle, and everything else was as it should be, then yes, eating less and moving more would have been all it would take to lose some excess weight and be healthy. 

A simple calorie deficit. 

That said, if we were living a natural lifestyle we wouldn’t have any excess weight to lose – there’s a lesson there!

These days there’s a LOT more that needs to be done to ensure health as well as weight loss.

For starters, focussing on “weight” isn’t the way to go. It means very little by itself.

ALWAYS measure body fat percentage alongside weight, otherwise you’ve got no idea what it is you’re weighing.

It’s body fat we want to lose, not weight.

The trick is to make sure that the “weight” you’re losing is coming from excess body fat and not muscle tissue, and for that, you need a bit more than a simple calorie deficit.

Eating junk ‘as long as you’re within your calorie target’ is not a good way to go. (So curly wurly’s and jelly aren’t good just because they’re “low points!”)

Neither is “Dieting” without strength training.

Those are two sure-fire ways to make sure you keep hold of body fat and lose muscle (and the strength that comes with it). Your “weight” might go down, but you’ll still look (and feel) soft with no definition. Certainly not “toned”.

On top of that, because weight loss doesn’t automatically equal health, there are other factors you need to consider to ensure better health alongside your fat loss.

Rest, recovery, sleep, hydration, daily activity levels, stress management, macro- and micro-nutrients, breathing and other lifestyle factors should all be taken into account and optimised.

Here are my top 5 tips for healthy fat loss:

1.     Strength Train – You won’t get big and bulky, but you’ll maintain muscle tissue and strength. Don’t avoid the weights in favour of cardio.

2.     Focus on Body Fat Percentage, not weight – As I mentioned above, this is what you really want to lose, not weight. So unless you’re measuring your body fat, you’ve got no idea if you’re making progress or not.

3.     Create a reasonable, but not excessive calorie deficit – A few hundred calories a day below your Total Daily Energy Expenditure [TDEE] (you can find a calculator online to find this out) is enough. Any more and you risk losing more muscle and less body fat.

4.     Sleep well – Create a sleep routine that gets you 7-9 hours of quality sleep per night.

5.     Hydrate – Make sure you’re fully hydrated with water!

 

There are plenty of other things you can (and should) do, but these will get you started and it’s a lot better than just “eating less and moving more!”

Remember, if you focus on “weight” loss, your health will likely suffer, but if you focus on health, you’ll lose “weight” (bodyfat) along the way.

I cover everything you need to do in order to drop body fat whilst improving health at www.MoveBetter.Club check it out for more details.

 

 

Mark

"To know and not do, is not to know"

Here's the thing...

Everyone knows they should do more.

They know what they need to do (supposedly).

YOU know.

...but do you do it?

For most people, the answer is NO.

That's what my job is.

My job is, essentially, to get people to DO what they know they should be doing.

So many people refuse to hire a coach or get help because "they know what to do" or "it's too expensive", but the reality is, they just place higher priority on other things.

They'd rather binge on Netflix than go workout.

They'd rather have the newest iPhone than pay for a coach.

They'd rather follow a free plan that's not working and kid themselves that they're doing the right things (even though it's not working???)

Fancy cars and clothes... going out every weekend... takeaways multiple nights a week... everyone's different, but mostpeople will happily drop £100's every week/month on stuff that's unnecessary (and even damaging their health!), yet they won't spend it on their health.

Then they drive around in the fancy car, wearing the fancy clothes, getting their hair and nails done, lips pumped full of crap or buying other stuff to make them look/feel better, still unhappy with the way they look, because they'll do everything but the most important things - eat well and train.

So the message here is simple:

If you're not getting the results you want, because you're either not doing what you should be, or you're doing the wrong things - you need a coach.

...and I'd love to help you.

If you're ready to:

• Invest in yourself, not "stuff"

• Improve your health

• Lose some excess weight

• Move better

• Feel better

• Put in the effort

And you need help with:

• Knowing what to do (the right things)

• Staying on track and accountable

• Working around a busy schedule

• Troubleshooting issues as they arise

• Support along the way

Book in for a quick call with me (no charge), to see how/if I can help you.

Just fill out the form here and I'll be in touch.

I really do want to help! I've spent 20 years learning this stuff and it goes to waste if I don't share it!

So fill out the form and let's chat. Then you can decide if you want my help or not.

Fill it out.

Mark

Sleep to Lose Fat

Please don't misunderstand me - sleep is NOT the magic pill to losing weight, BUT it does have a huge impact on your fat loss efforts.

You see, in a study aptly named "insufficient sleep undermines dietary efforts to reduce adiposity", they ran some tests.

Essentially, they took a group of overweight people, gave them the same amount of food and the same activity levels (mostly sedentary, and we'll get to that in a moment).

The only difference was, one group spent 8.5 hours in bed, and the other group spent 5.5 hours in bed (actual sleep times were about 7hrs 25mins and 5hrs 15mins respectively).

By the end of the study, BOTH groups lost about 3kg in weight (makes sense since the calorie deficit was similar across all participants).

BUT...

The group who slept only 5.5 hours lost 80% of that 3kg from muscle tissue and only 20% of it from fat mass.

The 8.5 hour sleep group however lost about 50% of the weight from muscle tissue and 50% from fat mass.

If you're in a calorie deficit, you can always expect to lose both muscle tissue and fat mass, but the ratio between the two is what makes all the difference.

In simple numbers, the 5.5 hour group lost about 0.6kg of fat, whereas the 8.5 hour group lost about 1.5kg of fat - that's nearly 3 times the amount!

Not to mention that losing muscle tissue is NOT something you should be striving for as it'll hinder your ability to burn more fat going forwards!

So, if body recomposition is your goal (losing body fat and gaining a bit of muscle), then SLEEP is your best friend!

Remember, these guys were on the same diet and activity levels, the only difference was the amount of sleep they were getting.

If you still think sleep isn't important for fat loss, I don't know what else I can do to convince you!

This also highlights why tracking just bodyweight is an absolute waste of time.

You could be destroying your muscle tissue and keeping hold of most of your fat, yet still think you're making progress because the number on the scales is going down.

Please, track measurements and body fat %, NOT just weight.

To make things worse, the 5.5 hour group also experienced more hunger, so if you're in the real world this would likely lead to more snacking and poorer food choices further hindering your fat loss efforts.

Now, as I mentioned earlier, the participants in the study were mainly sedentary - there was no real exercise protocol in place.

Since we know that resistance training will also affect the ratio between fat and muscle breakdown (in favour of more fat being used and muscle tissue retained) in a calorie deficit, it's fair to say that both groups would likely have had better ratios if they'd been training properly too.

It's unlikely that you could stop ALL muscle tissue being lost, but the ratios would be even better for the 8.5 hour group!

Going back to your fat loss efforts, it becomes clear that the key take homes here are:

1. You need to be in a calorie deficit to lose weight
2. You need adequate sleep to ensure more of that weight is coming from fat rather than lean tissue
3. You should be resistance training to further tip the scales in your favour in terms of where that "weight" is coming from

So no, sleep is NOT the magic pill, but it sure as hell will help in your fat loss efforts.

Check out my other posts for tips on how to improve both your sleep quantity and quality for the best results.

Reach out if you want more help :)

Mark

www.MoveBetter.Club

How Many Meals Should You Be Eating?

Some people swear by three meals a day; some people live on two. Others recommend from 5 up to 8 meals per day!

So what’s right?

Well, for starters, we’re all different, and what works for others may not work for you, and vice versa. 

What you need to pay attention to is how you feel when you follow different eating plans. If it makes you feel good, then it’s probably right for you, regardless of what the next guru says.

Before now I’ve recommended the “smaller meals every 2-3 hours” approach, and for some that’s great. Especially if your main goal is to bulk up – you need to eat more meals to get the sheer amount of food you need in. You can’t get 5,000 calories down you in 1 or 2 sittings (certainly not the right calories anyway!).

But, for fat loss and general health, as well as hormone optimisation (which is the key to weight loss, muscle gain, mood, energy levels, fat storage/burning, sleep and much more besides) I’ve come to realise that actually, despite all the reasons to do otherwise, we actually weren’t far wrong in the first place with the old “breakfast, lunch and dinner” routine.

There are a number of reasons for this, and although I HATE talking about calories (because if you’re eating the foods you’re supposed to be eating, calories really aren’t an issue), you’ll struggle to overeat on just 3 meals a day.

The key here is not to snack between meals. 3 meals means 3 meals. 

Various and numerous chemical reactions happen after we’ve eaten, and some hormones aren’t even released until 3-4+ hours after we’ve eaten, others take that long to get back to normal levels. 

The main hormones we’re concerned with here are Leptin and Insulin, which interact to determine when we feel full, and what we do with the food we’ve eaten. 

If these are out of whack, you can be sure your body fat levels will show it. The best way to address insulin resistance and leptin sensitivity is to take longer periods between eating, as well as selecting your foods carefully.

There’s a lot more to it than this, and I don’t have space here to go into detail, but you don’t need to know how or why it works to benefit from it. The most important thing you can do is to make sure when you do eat, you’re eating the right foods (see my previous articles/blog posts/website for details). 

So try it for a couple of weeks. Have a good breakfast (not toast/cereal etc. – have real food), then nothing until lunch 3-4 hours later, then nothing again, until dinner. No snacks between. No sugar-filled drinks (that includes “sugar-free” versions of things!). Just keep well hydrated.

Then when you’ve finished dinner – you’re fasting until breakfast 12+ hours later.

If you have breakfast at 9am, then lunch at 1pm, then dinner at 5pm - you're eating all of your meals within an 8-hour window (9-5), so you'll then be fasting for the reaming 16 hours each day. (See my other posts for more information on the benefits of fasting like this).

It’s important that you get all the nutrients you need at these three meals, so plenty of veg, lots of protein and fat from good sources, fruit, nuts and seeds. Don’t waste your meals with breads, pastas and other nutrient-free foods.

And always check with your GP before you make drastic changes to your diet – especially if you have any medical conditions. (Although I have to say that – it’s always a good idea!)

For more detailed guidance, check out MoveBetter.Club and get everything you need to start seeing the results you want.

Mark

Who Do You Want To Look Like?

There are many different training methods available to anyone that wants to lose weight. But which is best?

The most common option seems to be running. Many people who hate the thought of going to the gym, working out with weights, or attending fitness classes, opt to go running a few times a week in order to lose weight; but is this the best idea?

Bearing in mind that most people want to lose FAT, not WEIGHT, it’s safe to say that running ISN’T the best way to do it. There’s no doubt that it has worked for many people, but if you really want to reach your goals (which you may think are weight loss, but actually, you just want to fit into smaller clothes and look better – unfortunately, people have linked this with weight), you're better off doing resistance training.

Let’s make it easy to see what’s better for stripping fat and building the muscle that shapes your body...

Take a look at the average marathon runner – for the most part, they look skinny, emaciated, and generally not too healthy. They may weigh very little, but they have no muscle, and no shape to them – not the ideal figure is it?

Now take a look at a sprinter. They’re lean, muscular, with good shape and muscle tone. They look athletic and healthy, and will generally have LESS body fat than the marathoners.

Obviously these are two extremes, but the bottom line is if you want to lose fat, shape and tone your body, and look and feel strong and healthy, you need to ditch the long cardio sessions and start working with high intensity intervals (sprints if running’s your chosen activity) and start lifting weights.

If you enjoy jogging, then by all means, go jogging. But unless your goal is to be “skinny fat” (where you weigh very little and look skinny, but still have a high body fat – mainly due to a lack of muscle), then you also need to be doing intervals and weight training.

Another easy way to see what you need to be doing is to walk into any gym. Are the people who look how you want to look walking on the treadmill for 20 minutes, then moving across to sit on a bike for half hour and watch EastEnders? ... Or are they in the freeweights area lifting weights?

Don’t be fooled by the common misconception that cardio burns more calories. Use your muscles and lift weights that you struggle to finish your set with i.e. if you’re aiming for 12 lifts (repetitions), you should struggle to finish the last 2 or 3. 

Just take a look at British champion weightlifter Evelyn Stevenson (Google her name).

Not exactly the hulky mass of muscle that people (especially women) are afraid of becoming if they lift a weight!

It should be clear, just by looking at the different athletes, which type of training will produce the best results – if you want to look like a sprinter, train like a sprinter.

This may go against what you thought was the best way to train and what you’ve been told by magazines, friends, even trainers in the gym. But really, it’s pretty obvious.

Be aware also that the same goes for diet. Just because you’ve read it, a friend recommended it, or a trainer has told you to do it, doesn’t mean it’s the right way. Even if it works, there might still be a better way, and it’s usually the most obvious.

If you’d like to know more about how best to eat and train for your goals you can joining my membership site MoveBetter.Club where you'll be guided, step-by-step through nutrition and training to get the best results.

Mark

Weight Loss or Fat Loss

I hope you're well. 

For this post I wanted to talk about something that a lot of people get a bit confused about...

The difference between weight loss and fat loss.

Most people will say they want to "lose weight", but what they really mean is they want to lose body fat.

"Weight" on the scales means very little.

When you jump on the scales, you're weighing not just body fat, but also muscle, bone, the contents of your stomach, the contents of your bowels...

(I'll never forget watching an episode of "The Biggest Loser" when one of the contestants lost a pound that week and one of the trainers furiously exclaimed "A pound?! I could shit a pound!" - Brilliant!)

It's actually an incredibly poor indicator of how much fat you're losing.

Everyone who's ever attended Weight Watchers or similar knows this - they often avoid eating all day before a weigh-in so the scales don't say they've put on weight!

That's a great way to deceive yourself and everyone else!

(They then proceed to smash an entire days' calories in one sitting, with their "low points" curly wurly's and pink wafers!)

IF you're going to weigh yourself - and let's face it, it IS something that people are worried about and the easiest metric to track - you need to do it at the same time every day, ideally first thing in the morning before you eat or drink anything, and then work out your weekly average. Then compare week to week.

DO NOT use a single day as a snapshot, because "weight" fluctuates massively.

But really, what you should be tracking is FAT LOSS

This is the one people are really thinking of when they talk about "weight loss".

No-one wants to shed 2 stone of muscle and keep hold of all of their fat - that would be insane.

Yet the scales would have you believe you're achieving your goal, because the number is dropping!

So in order to really know whether you're heading in the right direction or not, you need to be measuring your body fat percentage and using that to track your progress.

Ditch the scales, and start tracking body fat - that's what people are really trying to lose, not "weight".

If your body fat percentage drops, you know you've lost body fat, not muscle.

(The other way to decrease body fat, as a percentage, would be to increase muscle mass - this would likely mean an increase in weight!)

So whilst it's ok to talk about "weight loss", just remember that what you're really talking about is fat loss, and maybe replace the "weight loss" talk with "fat loss" talk to help other people realise the difference too.

If you ever hear me talking about weight loss, know that it's simply because that's what most people still talk about and think of - I will always mean, and be focussing on, fat loss. I'm just using language people resonate with. 

Using weight as a measure of progress would be doing people a massive injustice, and anyone who uses bodyweight to measure success is doing people a disservice (you know who I'm talking about).

Don't fall victim to the "weight loss" crowd. The fact they focus on weight shows they don't know what they're talking about.

And as for BMI...! Height to weight ratio is meaningless if you're using "weight" (12 stone of fat or 12 stone of muscle? There's a BIG difference!) 

I truly can't believe the NHS and even the army still use BMI - it truly isn't a "health" service - just a "sick" service.

Do yourself a favour - start tracking your body fat percentage and STOP stressing over your weight.

Unless you're 30 stone (in which case, yes, any weight loss is likely going to help extend your life right now), you should be looking at body fat, not weight.

There are various options, but just make sure you use the SAME method each time you measure, under the same conditions wherever possible.

The Naval Method is the cheapest option and is reasonably accurate.

I'd avoid the scales that supposedly measure BF% - mine are literally 10% OVER my actual BF% - not accurate AT ALL.

Leave a comment if you've found this useful.

Mark

Are You Fasting? ...Or Are You Starving Yourself?

I've always said that fasting should NOT be done for weight loss, just that weight loss can be a welcome side effect of fasting.

But there's a big difference between starving yourself (huge calorie deficit), and fasting done properly.

You see, fasting doesn't simply mean not eating, it's not eating for a specific period of time.

It doesn't necessarily mean eating fewer calories, it just means you eat them within a specific time window.

Many people jump on the fasting bandwagon and just start skipping meals, but they still pick at things between meals (especially calorie-containing drinks).

This is not fasting. It's just calorie restriction, and it can be dangerous.

If you want to start fasting, you need to pick your time period and not consume ANY calories (food or drink) within that time window.

The caveat though, to ensure you're not just starving yourself, is that you need to consume your regular daily calories when you do eat (though usually not all in one go).

This is where many people get it wrong.

Yes, you can save yourself a few calories by fasting because usually it's quite difficult to over-eat in a short time window (*if eating the right foods). 

And you can deliberately eat fewer calories (if hoping to achieve weight loss) whilst practicing fasting, but that's not the goal of fasting.

What you need to focus on when you do eat, is quality of food and nutritional content.

If you're eating fewer calories, you need to make sure you're getting all the nutrition you need from those calories.

Traditional "Diets" (and many of the "Diet" based clubs) have focused purely on calories, which will work to an extent, for a while... until it doesn't any more; but they don't focus on health.

During your non-fasting periods, you should:

1. Ensure you're getting adequate calories (set your calorie target based on your goals)

2. Prioritise healthy, nutritious foods over junk foods

3. Make sure you're hitting your Protein target - protein literally means "first place" or "primary" (derived from the Greek word Proteios)

4. Split the remaining calories (after protein) between carbohydrates and fats - again, your personal nutritional requirements will determine the ratio for this.

Whilst fasting, you should:

1. Not consume ANY calories, or "calorie-free" drinks (like "Diet" sodas etc.)

2. Drink plenty of water to stay hydrated and help with hunger

3. Keep yourself busy - often it's boredom that gets us, not actual hunger

I see too many people starving themselves all day only to come home and gorge themselves with junk food, because we tend to make poor food choices when we're hungry; certainly opting for quicker, easier, more convenient options, which are rarely the most nutritious.

So, if you're planning on using one of the the many fasting options out there (for most it will generally boil down to intermittent fasting of varying time windows), ensure that when you do eat, you're eating good, healthy foods, and not stuffing yourself with whatever you fancy "because you haven't eaten all day".

I talk about my preferred method of fasting in the trainings in MoveBetter.Club, so if you want more help with nutrition, training and lifestyle to improve health and get you moving better, check it out.

MoveBetter.Club

Mark

How to calculate your Body Fat Percentage

I’ve mentioned before how tracking weight can be misleading, given that you’re weighing not only fat, but also muscle, bone, organs, fluids and more.

Another metric people use to track progress is body fat percentage. 

This is more useful since it’s, in theory, only measuring your body fat, so any changes do mean that you’ve changed the amount of body fat you have (as a percentage of your total bodyweight).

Whilst it’s a bit backward that we measure weight in kilos/pounds etc and bodyfat as a percentage, it is still a great way to track progress.

There are a number of ways to measure body fat percentage and you have to be very careful about which you use and how seriously you take it.

Bioelectrical Impedance (handheld monitors, scales that measure body fat, and similar devices that you simply hold, stand on, or attach to your body in some way) are incredibly inaccurate and can be affected by many factors – hydration levels, if you have any creams/lotions on your hands/feet, even how you are standing when testing. If you use these, don’t take the reading as being completely accurate, and at the very least, use the exact same equipment every time, and make sure the conditions are the same.

Skinfold/Caliper Testing. This is where someone (hopefully trained in the use of skinfold calipers) takes a number of measurements at certain points around your body and uses a calculation to determine your body fat percentage. This can be more accurate than the handheld devices, but depends completely on the competence and skill of the person taking the measurements. It’s also quite intrusive, having someone pinch your fat rolls and measure them! Again, be sure that your practitioner is well accustomed to taking these measurements to reduce the margin of error.

DEXA Scan is considered the gold standard and most accurate way of measuring body fat, but this is an expensive option, and will likely require some travelling to somewhere that offers it. By all means use this method if it is within your means.

The last method I’m going to talk about here is called the Navy Method, and I’ve found it to be a reasonably accurate method of measuring body fat percentage when a DEXA scan or skilled skinfold testing is not available or appropriate, and all you need to do it is a tape measure (and a helper).

To do this, you simply need to measure your navel, neck and height (for men), or your natural waist, hips, neck and height (for women).

Once you have these measurements you can enter them into a calculator that will give you a reasonably accurate estimate of your body fat percentage. A simple google search for “navy method body fat calculator” will give you plenty of options.

I find this to be a good way of measuring body fat without needless expense or intrusion.

Take all measurements 3 times to ensure better accuracy, and you can use the results to track progress and help you decide if you need to make any adjustments to your diet or training plan.


Remember though, if you aren't getting the results you want, be honest with yourself and ensure that you are sticking to your plan before you change it!

Most people, if they're being honest, probably aren't sticking to the plan, yet wonder why it isn't working. If you're (honestly) sticking to your plan at least 80% of the time and still aren't getting results, then adjust the plan; but if you're simply not sticking to it, work harder at that before you change anything.

The only caveat to this is if you're trying to follow a plan that's too strict and you can't follow it. Then you'll need to adjust it to something that is achievable for you.

Bodyweight: Should you be tracking it?

Whilst it is the most common metric to track (because it’s the easiest to measure and has been the main measurement people have always tracked historically), tracking body weight can be a double-edged sword.

Most people associate weight with fat, but in reality, fat is only a small part of what you’re weighing on the scales - muscle, fluids, bone, organs, even your dinner are also going to affect your “weight”.

What most people who want to lose weight actually want is fat loss, not weight loss (the two don’t necessarily have to come together).

The confusion around bodyweight can cause as much of a hinderance as a help.

Would I recommend tracking weight if your goal is fat loss?

It depends...

If you’re fully aware of what weight really means, and can check it, then forget it, then yes, it would be helpful to track it and keep an eye on your progress to see if what you’re doing is working or not.

But if you’re the type of person to get hung up on it, and stress about it if it’s not doing what you want (even through that my not mean what you think it means), then definitely no.

Also, daily weight changes can be huge (a couple of kilos up or down are quite normal), and you need to be aware that you simply can’t gain or lose weight from fat or muscle that quickly! Use some common sense.

Unless you’re swimming the channel or doing something of equal challenge, you’re unlikely to lose a measurable amount of weight from either fat or muscle in a day. Likewise, unless you gorge on 20,000 calories, you’re unlikely to gain much either. So, your pound or two weight fluctuation from one day to the next is almost certainly going to be down to, predominantly, hydration levels.

If you are tracking your weight, my advice would be to measure it daily, at the same time, under the same conditions (upon waking, after using the toilet will be the most consistent).

[If you don’t believe how important this simple tip is, weigh yourself first thing in the morning, as soon as you get up, then weigh yourself again that same evening and see how different the measurement is!]

Then take an average at the end of each week (add up all the weights then divide by 7). This will be a far more accurate way to track your weight that will even out the ups and downs from hydration levels etc. You can then compare your weight week to week to see if you’re making progress or not.

Women should also be aware (and I know you all are) that weight can vary dramatically over the course of the month. This is again due to hormones and fluids, NOT a sudden 5lb fat gain overnight!

You’ll have to compare each week/phase with the same week/phase next month to get a more accurate measure of progress. This may seem like too much, but your goal should be long-term, so you have the time to do this, and if you’ve chosen to use bodyweight as your main measurement, this is worth doing to get a real idea of your progress.

Week to week would not be a fair comparison for these reasons.

So, whilst it can be useful, it’s up to you whether you choose to use weight as a measure of progress. Just remember, if you LOOK better, FEEL better, and are STRONGER and FITTER - does weight really matter?

Obviously, the more metrics you can use to monitor your progress, the better idea you’ll have of whether what you’re doing is working or not. Personally (and with my clients), I track bodyweight (as described here), measurements (neck, chest, waist, hips, thighs as standard, possibly also shoulders, arms and calves), bodyfat % (as accurately as possible, usually using the naval method as well as bioelectrical impedance readings), and progress photos.

These, along with training records (have weights increased? Fitness levels increased? Recovery times improved?) give me a very clear understanding of how the program is working.

Track as many variables as you reasonably can and use these to monitor your progress, and don’t panic over a pound or two here and there unless it’s consistently going in the wrong direction!

Get in touch if you need more help :)

www.MarkOneFitness.co.uk